Below is an example of what plagiarism looks like.
It will help you see the difference between acceptable paraphrasing and plagiarism.
Original Text
If the existence of a signing ape was unsettling for linguists, it was also startling news for animal behaviourists (Davis, 1993; p. 26).
Plagiarised Text
If the existence of a signing ape was unsettling for linguists, it was also startling news for animal behaviourists. Note: This is plagiarism as the writer has used exactly the same words and not acknowledged the source. To use this text word for word you have to acknowledge the source by placing in brackets the author’s name, date of publication, and page number. You would also need to put it in double quotation marks (“ ”). If you listed the author and the date but failed to identify it as a quote this would still be plagiarism. The existence of a signing ape unsettled linguists and was also startling news for animal behaviourists (Davis, 1993; p. 26). Note: Even though the writer has acknowledged the source and changed one or two words, they have not used quotation marks around the direct quotes “the existence of a signing ape” and “was also startling news for animal behaviourists”. Therefore it is still plagiarism.
No Plagiarism
According to Davis (1993), linguists and animal behaviourists were unprepared for the news that a chimp could communicate with its trainers through sign language. Note: This is paraphrasing of the original text. The words used are different to the original and the sentence structure is changed. No page number is needed in this case. If you do not want to be accused of plagiarism make sure to reference all quotations and paraphrases, any ideas that are not your own, and facts that are not general knowledge.Below is an example of what plagiarism looks like. It will help you see the difference between acceptable paraphrasing and plagiarism.
Original Text
If the existence of a signing ape was unsettling for linguists, it was also startling news for animal behaviourists (Davis, 1993; p. 26).
Plagiarised Text
If the existence of a signing ape was unsettling for linguists, it was also startling news for animal behaviourists. Note: This is plagiarism as the writer has used exactly the same words and not acknowledged the source. To use this text word for word you have to acknowledge the source by placing in brackets the author’s name, date of publication, and page number. You would also need to put it in double quotation marks (“ ”). If you listed the author and the date but failed to identify it as a quote this would still be plagiarism. The existence of a signing ape unsettled linguists and was also startling news for animal behaviourists (Davis, 1993; p. 26). Note: Even though the writer has acknowledged the source and changed one or two words, they have not used quotation marks around the direct quotes “the existence of a signing ape” and “was also startling news for animal behaviourists”. Therefore it is still plagiarism.
No Plagiarism
According to Davis (1993), linguists and animal behaviourists were unprepared for the news that a chimp could communicate with its trainers through sign language. Note: This is paraphrasing of the original text. The words used are different to the original and the sentence structure is changed. No page number is needed in this case. If you do not want to be accused of plagiarism make sure to reference all quotations and paraphrases, any ideas that are not your own, and facts that are not general knowledge.
View the video below on for tips to avoid Accidental Plagiarism